![]() ![]() So now to spend even more money on Compressor and again hit this wall of incompatibility is very frustrating. xml transfer between the programs does NOT work. only again to see that despite how Apple has advertised it. As an aside: I just spent a lot of money upgrading to Logic Pro X (from Logic 9) in order to clean up the audio from my Final Cut Pro X projects. How can freeware like Handbrake handle these files, but not Compressor which is advertised as being the all-encompassing, state of the art converter software for Mac? Why add functions for HDR, HEVC, 360 video, when you can't even open old mpeg2 files that you created with earlier versions of Compressor/DVD studio pro.Īpple needs to CLEARLY state this somewhere before you buy the software. These are files created with earlier versions of Apple software. I've got to say that this is so frustrating. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Uggghhh.ĭoes Apple state this anywhere that you know of? Tech specs on their own page says it encodes mpeg 2 as well as has "full quicktime support" (quicktime will open and play these files on my mac, just not Compressor). ![]() Ok so Compressor does not support mpeg2 files. Compare the file sizes and bit rates of each recording option provided by the camera.Hi Tom, thanks again. Just use the workflow and shooting/conversion method that works for you. You can still do the transcoding independently if you wish, though.Īnyway, these two last paragraphs are relevant only if you're planning to edit your video clips into your 'movie.' If not, you don't really need to worry about it. That process has been made more or less redundant recently, since many NLE's today can handle AVCHD files on the fly. ![]() "Back in the day" I would transcode my AVCHD clips into more editable formats like ProRes before importing them into my editing app. In that case, if the size of the converted file is slightly larger than the original AVCHD file, you don't have to worry about any quality loss. But then you'd always be shooting in the highest quality settings to begin with, whichever the format happens to be, and the whole conversion issue is slightly different, as the whole point of the conversion is to turn the format with a bunch of uppercase letters into another, more editable format. If you're going to edit your videos, you're likely to pay more attention to the final quality. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Other great apps like EditReady are Shutter Encoder, Freemake Video Converter, Adobe Media Encoder and Elegant Converter. The best alternative is HandBrake, which is both free and Open Source. Again, it sort of depends on what you wish to accomplish. There are seven alternatives to EditReady for a variety of platforms, including Mac, Windows, Linux, BSD and AppImageHub. Anyway, some apps simply rewrap one package into another so that it's readable by your desired player, some apps can do more. The 'worst damage' is often done in the camera already. In general, the simple conversion does not reduce the quality, at least significantly. In case it's for direct playback only and the file sizes match, you might as well be shooting in the mp4 format. Will they be for immediate playback or uploading to YouTube, or for further editing in some NLE, for example. If there seem to be no difference in file size or bit rate between those options, then it's a matter of taste and depends on how and where you'll be using those recorded clips. I'm pretty sure the difference of those options is covered in the manual of the camera somewhere. If that happens to be the AVCHD option, use that. Therefore it would make sense to choose the option offering the highest bit rate (bytes/bits per second) option that is also making the largest file size. The mp4 option is probably offering the lowest bit rate and smallest file size, which means it's probably recorded in lower quality than the other option(s). My question is this: If I video on the AVCHD format, and then convert the files to MP4 using a video converter program, will the extra quality in the original AVCHD format files be lost in the conversion and I may as well have videod using MP4 setting, or does the conversion from AVCHD to MP4 retain the extra quality?Ĭompare the file sizes and bit rates of each option provided by the camera. , iFrame or MP4 recording formats to record motion pictures using this unit". ![]() My panasonic videocam says this in the instruction manual: "You can select from AVCHD. I take it you're talking about using your video clips as they are, without any editing? I have tried the newest version, in fact, after 0.93 HandBrake really sucks, no more avi or mov format available and the worse, audio conversion is not. AVCHD converted to MP4 files - is the extra AVCHD quality lost in the conversion? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |